This message is displayed because client-side scripting is turned off or not supported in the browser you are currently using.
Please turn on client-side scripting or install a browser that supports client-side scripting.

Ontario Government | Ministry of Labour | Site Map | Accessibility | text resize: A A A

Home | About Us | OWT Library | Forms | Practice Directions | Decision Search | Contact Us | Fran├žais

Established in 1985, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) is the final level of appeal to which workers and employers may bring disputes concerning workplace safety and insurance matters in Ontario. WSIAT has always been separate from and independent of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.

Questions?

Decisions

Appeal Process

For Representatives

Finding a Representative

Documents & Publications

Legal/Medical Resources

Popular Topics

Links to Other Agencies

Highlights of Noteworthy Decisions

  Decision 2590 17 I
9/14/2017
J. Smith - B. Wheeler - S. Roth

  • Procedure (production of documents) (medical report) (raw data)

The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Resolution Officer denying ongoing entitlement for brain and concussion injuries.
The ARO decision placed significant weight on the reporting of a psychologist, who stated that the worker's test performance indicated that he was either not putting forth the effort or that he was purposely performing poorly and, thus, met the diagnostic criteria for probable malingered neurocognitive dysfunction.
In this decision, the Panel considered the worker's request for release of the psychologist's raw test data. The psychologist denied the request, and the worker was now requesting that the Tribunal obtain the raw data.
Practice Guidelines of the Canadian Psychological Association state that psychologists avoid releasing information that requires professional training for interpretation or analysis to persons who lack that training. The Standards of Professional Conduct of the College of Psychologists of Ontario provide for the protection of security of tests. When reasonable and appropriate, raw data is released with proper authorization, but test materials, such as questions and stimuli, manuals and protocols will not be released.
The Panel reviewed two Tribunal decisions, as well as a decision of Ontario Superior Court, and denied the worker's request for the raw data. Interpretation of the results of psychological testing generally requires the assistance of an expert in neuropsychology. The raw data would be of little assistance in the absence of appropriate expert assistance.
The Panel note that nothing prevents the worker and his representative from finding a psychologist trained to interpret the raw test data and asking the psychologist to obtain and interpret the data for them.
The worker's request for the Tribunal to obtain the raw data was denied.