This message is displayed because client-side scripting is turned off or not supported in the browser you are currently using.
Please turn on client-side scripting or install a browser that supports client-side scripting.

WSIAT | Decision Search Results
Home | About Us | OWT Library | Forms | Practice Directions | Decision Search | Contact Us | Français
 

Questions | Decisions | Appeal Process | For Representatives | Finding a Representative
Documents & Publications | Legal/Medical Resources | Popular Topics | Links to Other Agencies

About WSIAT Decisions

Decision Search

How to Search WSIAT Decisions

Noteworthy Decisions

Decision Search Results

Searching, please wait...

Displaying 1 to 2 of 2 Summaries
Decision No. 2082 07 31-Dec-2009 S. Ryan - B. Wheeler - D. Broadbent

  • Smoking (second-hand smoke)

  • Cancer (tonsil)


  • The worker was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the left tonsil in 1989. The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Resolution Officer denying entitlement for the cancer.

    The worker related the cancer to second-hand smoke while travelling to and from the employer’s work site on an employer bus between March 1975 and May 1976.

    Medical experts who reviewed the history of this case found a causal relationship unlikely. There was a lack of epidemiological evidence supporting a specific association between exposure to second-hand smoke and squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil. The worker’s exposure was not particularly high or of long duration. The Standard Incidence Ratio (SIR) was only about 121.

    The Vice-Chair concluded that the worker’s cancer was not related to workplace exposure. The appeal was dismissed.
    View Full Decision Text 

    References:Act Citation
  • WCA


  • Other Case Reference
  • [w0710s]

  • CROSS-REFERENCE: Decision No. 2082/07I

  • TRIBUNAL DECISIONS CONSIDERED: 1645/99R consd, 429/02 consd

  • Neutral Citation:2009 ONWSIAT 3035

    Decision No. 2082 07 I 24-Oct-2008 S. Ryan - B. Wheeler - D. Broadbent

  • Adjournment (additional medical evidence)

  • Evidence (expert)


  • The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Resolution Officer denying entitlement for tonsillar cancer.

    The worker sought to enter a report from the Research Director with Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada. The author of the report had a Master of Arts degree in Sociology. He had extensive experience in the field of public policy and advocacy but his experience was not relevant to the issue of causation in this case. He did not have credentials to qualify as an expert in medical or epidemiological causation. He had been involved in cancer research but did not have a medical degree or doctorate in any other specialty. The Panel concluded that the author of the report did not qualify as an expert witness. However, his report was admitted into evidence and would be treated as submissions on behalf of the worker about how evidence in the case should be interpreted.

    The hearing was adjourned to obtain a report from a Tribunal medical assessor.
    View Full Decision Text 24 Page(s)

    References:Act Citation
  • WCA


  • Other Case Reference
  • [w5008s]

  • CASES CONSIDERED: Dulong v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. (2006), 23 C.P.C. (6th) 172 (Ont. S.C.J.) consd

  • CROSS-REFERENCE: Decision No. 2082/07

  • TRIBUNAL DECISIONS CONSIDERED: Decision No. 2106/03 (2006), 80 W.S.I.A.T.R. (online) consd

  • Neutral Citation:2008 ONWSIAT 2797

    Refine Search
     to:
     Reported Decisions Only
     Noteworthy Decisions Only
     Summarized Decisions Only
     Decision Summary                Style Of Cause
     Structured Keywords             Neutral Citation
     References

    Click here to start search Click here to reset the form Clear Form for New Search     Click here to do a structured keyword search Click here to open help