This message is displayed because client-side scripting is turned off or not supported in the browser you are currently using.
Please turn on client-side scripting or install a browser that supports client-side scripting.

WSIAT | Decision Search Results
Home | About Us | OWT Library | Forms | Practice Directions | Decision Search | Contact Us | Français
 

Questions | Decisions | Appeal Process | For Representatives | Finding a Representative
Documents & Publications | Legal/Medical Resources | Popular Topics | Links to Other Agencies

About WSIAT Decisions

Decision Search

How to Search WSIAT Decisions

Noteworthy Decisions

Decision Search Results

Searching, please wait...

Displaying 1 of 1 Summaries
Decision No. 2076 09 24-Nov-2009 S. Martel

  • Mesothelioma

  • Exposure (asbestos)

  • Hospital employment (nursing)


  • The worker was a nurse in a hospital from 1982 to 1996. She was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1997, and died in 2005. The worker’s estate appealed a decision of the Appeals Resolution Officer denying entitlement.

    There was asbestos pipe insulation in most areas of the hospital, as well as asbestos fireproofing in false ceilings. However, all the asbestos was contained and intact. Friable asbestos was found in some industrial areas of the hospital but the worker would not have come into those areas.

    Mesothelioma is listed in Schedule 4. There is an irrebuttable presumption of entitlement where there is a diagnosis of mesothelioma and a finding that the worker was involved in an enumerated process found to generate airborne asbestos fibres. The irrebuttable presumption did not apply in this case because the worker was not employed in any of the enumerated processes. Thus, entitlement had to be determined based on the balance of probabilities.

    The Vice-Chair found that the worker’s exposure to asbestos in the course of employment was extremely minimal. The Vice-Chair also noted that the latency period in this case was less than 20 years. Given the short latency period and the extremely minimal exposure, the Vice-Chair concluded that the mesothelioma was not related to workplace exposure. The appeal was dismissed.
    View Full Decision Text 11 Page(s)

    References:Act Citation
  • WCA


  • Other Case Reference
  • [w0210s]

  • BOARD DIRECTIVES AND GUIDELINES: Operational Policy Manual, Documents No. 04-04-15, 16-02-12

  • TRIBUNAL DECISIONS CONSIDERED: 1906/99 consd, 817/01 consd, 2244/01 consd, 2077/08 consd

  • Neutral Citation:2009 ONWSIAT 2747

    Refine Search
     to:
     Reported Decisions Only
     Noteworthy Decisions Only
     Summarized Decisions Only
     Decision Summary                Style Of Cause
     Structured Keywords             Neutral Citation
     References

    Click here to start search Click here to reset the form Clear Form for New Search     Click here to do a structured keyword search Click here to open help